Skip to content

Is There Any Good in Scientology?

I’m an ex-Scientologist who spent 27 years as an active member of that group, most
of that time working at its highest levels in the Sea Organization. Yes, that is a
long time and I did learn and experience almost everything Scientology has to offer.

Since leaving it two years ago, I’ve learned a lot more about my old group and I’ve
made a lot of videos about it. I’ll probably be making quite a few more. Scientology
does seem to be the gift that keeps on giving when it comes to ridiculous claims,
harmful and destructive practices and laughably bad public relations. But I thought
it was time that I give a kind of final statement on the subject, something that
could be easily digested in just a couple of minutes and would be a sort of summary
of everything else that I have said before or will say in the future.

People have asked me many times about whether there is anything good in Scientology
or whether there was anything worthwhile I got out of it. My easy answer has been,
“Well of course there was good in it” because no one would stay involved in
something like that for that long if there wasn’t. But, the real answer isn’t quite
that simple.

You see, one of the biggest lies Hubbard perpetrated on his followers and gets away
with to this day, even in the ex-Scientology community, is that he was the single
source of Scientology. He drummed this in so hard that people in Scientology actualy
call him Source, saying this with a kind of worship and reverence that Hubbard
completely does not deserve.

It took me quite a while after I got out to realize that Hubbard was not only a
pathological liar about himself and his own life, but he also lied through his teeth
about having “discovered” Dianetics and Scientology. He used words like “research”
and “discover” to give himself a legitimacy that he did not earn through hard work
or real scientific research. Instead, he literally ripped off the work of others and
pretended that it had come from him, or he just made things up.

For anyone familiar with Dianetics and Scientology teachings, I’m not talking about
a few suggestions that people might have thrown Hubbard’s way over the years. I’m
talking about the very fundamental basics of the subject. Things such as Dianetics
procedure, which comes straight out of hypnotism and original Freudian practice. The
idea that the basic unit of the universe is two, not one, comes from Buckminster
Fuller, a contemporary of Hubbard who was cited by Hubbard in various places but
only credited once. The Study Technology was not Hubbard’s discovery – he flat out
lied about this in the mid-60s after two English teachers, who were also
Scientologists, presented it to him at Saint Hill in England. Then there’s the E-
meter, which Hubbard tried unsuccessfully to rip off from Volney Matheson in the
early 50s. When that didn’t work, Hubbard told Scientologists they were unnecessary
for auditing and there were no E-meters in use from 1954 to 1957 until another
Scientologist loyal to Hubbard figured out how to make them using transistors. Then
Hubbard slapped his name on them and suddenly they were his invention.

When you look at the stark truth of this, you start to see that a lot of the “good”
that Scientology provides is not really Scientology at all but is plagiarized work
from another source. So to answer the question of whether there is anything good to
be gotten from Scientology, you first have to look at whether you are actually doing
Scientology or you are doing something else entirely.

So what kind of things did Hubbard actually invent or “discover” himself? Well,
there’s the totalitarian ethics and justice system he developed in the mid-60s which
demands total compliance with Hubbard’s every word lest you be labeled a suppressive
person and cast out of the Church forever. There’s the whole system of
disconnection, one of the harshest forms of shunning that exists amongst any
religious group in the world. Families, friendships and whole businesses have been
torn apart through exact application of Hubbard’s directions.

And it doesn’t end there. Hubbard also developed the Guardian’s Office, which was
responsible for carrying out his orders to “ruin people utterly”, Scientologist or
not, if they dared to speak one critical word against him or Scientology. They call
this practice Fair Game because they think that anyone who speaks against the Church
basically deserves anything that comes at them and it’s the Scientologists’
responsibility to make sure that person suffers as much as possible.

This is so well documented, it’s not even a question that it happens nor that
Hubbard was directly responsible for ordering it in the first place. The Guardian’s
Office was caught breaking the law in one of the largest criminal conspiracies ever
documented against the US government. But did they learn their lesson and stop? No.
Hubbard simply morphed the Guardian’s Office into the Office of Special Affairs,
which continues to carry on the tradition of Fair Gaming with campaigns of hate and
harassment leveled against Scientology critics including the people featured in Alex
Gibney’s recent documentary, appropriately titled Going Clear: Scientology and the
Prison of Belief. Even Church leader David Miscavige’s own father is not exempt from
harassment and stalking after he left the Church’s employment a few years ago.

Any good that Scientology has managed to do over the 60 years of its existence has
been completely eclipsed by the lies, fraud and tangible harm it is brought to far
more people than it ever helped.

People are amazing and they are capable of helping their fellow man in the most
adverse of conditions, under the most distressing of circumstances. That people have
done that in Scientology is a testament to their greatness, not Scientology’s
workability. The help that came to people in Scientology was done despite
Scientology, not because of it.

In the end, Scientology has been and continues to be about one thing and one thing
only: making money for one man. At first that man was L. Ron Hubbard. Now it’s David
Miscavige. Everything else is window dressing, designed to entrap and ruin the very
people it is claiming to save. And THAT is Scientology.

Thank you for watching.

13 thoughts on “Is There Any Good in Scientology?”

  1. This may just be your best video yet Chris! One thing that upset me a lot was realizing that Hubbard’s “research” largely consisted of him pulling things out of his ass. I had really been sold on the idea that he had done extensive research and tests all those years.

  2. Your a brave man for exposing Scientology for what it is. I pray you are safe and nothing bad happens to you. You also have a talent for speaking and writing. I am so glad Chris you were able to figure out what you had got yourself into and somewhere along the way had a epiphany regarding logic and critical thinking. Because you were in the high levels of management, you have insights to how the church operates and clearly make a great spokesperson for uncovering the truth about this deceitful organization.

    There is more I would like to comment on but I know the CoS is dangerous foe. They will hurt those speaking out against them if they think they can get away with it. Its hard for me to believe Shawn Lonsdale did himself in for example but their is no prove to show it was foul play.

  3. This is a well presented and valid exposure of the fraud that Hubbard practiced on his fellows. You are quite right Chris, all that appeared to benefit people was in fact the bair in the trap placed there by the conman.
    And it is very true that he himself did not develop any truly beneficial procedures as he never competently of fully did research . . . everything he presented was an attempt to razzle- dazzle the “punter.”
    And as far as his false PR of being man’s great benefactor . . . that is a total lie as his every move, as revealed in his “affirmations” and as demonstrated by his effort to destroy the reputation of of his own creation, Dianetics, when he did not have control of it while all the while believing it was valuable as demonstrate in his resurrection of it in 1969.
    Verification of this is to be had in the early editions of his book: Scientology 8-8008. I have uploaded scans of the comparative early and recent altered versions of this book on ESMB so folks can verify this fact and see how Hubbard himself acted to deny people the use of Dianetics in the period when he did not control the subject due to loss of rights in bankruptcy of the original foundations.
    See link:
    Altered versions of 8-8008 and lies re Dianetics . . .
    http://www.forum.exscn.net/showthread.php?2678-Comparison-of-Book-Editions&p=426230&viewfull=1#post426230
    And it written out . .
    http://www.forum.exscn.net/showthread.php?10103-The-old-days-Aboard-the-Apollo-1973/page61&p=412862#post412862

  4. Ron did not say that he was the only source of the technology. He did say that he put it together from various sources to make a workable path.
    I had helped many people with the technology and I have been helped by the technology. It is for people who enjoy helping others.
    I was raised with it since 1950, and it made a difference to be reminded that one is a spirit, had previous lives and will continue to as one’s choice.
    You state your experience as fact about what Scientology is. It has been corrupted by a person who is an actual suppressive person and who never experienced case gain. He saw that it made money.
    Ron did not live in luxury like this criminal did and does.
    My family was highly respected in the Church. We were declared in 2007 for made up reasons, and it was totally non standard. I never got to read any report by anyone, nor who called to have us declared.
    I was around when the tech produced miracles. WE all had fun and it was fulfilling to help people. Unfortunately, heavy ethics came into the picture and steadily destroyed the basic reason we were involved.

    1. I actually quoted in the video the exact place where L. Ron Hubbard did say that he was the source of Dianetics and Scientology. He further said in KSW #1 that it was not a group effort and he gives credit to no one else but himself for figuring out “how to get out of the trap”. Hubbard’s own writings about this are crystal clear, so it’s a mystery to me how you can even begin to think otherwise.

      I’m sorry that you are unwilling to look at or avail yourself of the full range of information easily available about L. Ron Hubbard, his lifestyle and the callous lies and deceit he engaged in during his entire life. You are simply not living in reality if you think that Hubbard did not live an opulent lifestyle, freely spending money as fast as he made it and then accumulating more than he ever could spend by the end of his life.

      The facts I cite in my videos are facts. I don’t make them up and it’s not my opinion that L. Ron Hubbard plagiarized the work of others, represented himself and his life to be other than what it really was, or that he created the Guardian’s Office, Suppressive Person policy, disconnection and all the rest of the horrors that Scientology visits upon its members every single day. It’s up to you what you choose to believe, but you don’t get to choose your facts. They are what they are. Like I said, the fact that you have been helped by others in this group or have helped others is in spite of Scientology, not because of it. I mean, where do you think that heavy ethics you speak of came from? Whose policies do you think Miscavige is following?

  5. Even in Hubbards videoed demo-sessions nothing really happens with the PCs. No spectacular wins, rather a drag.

  6. Hi Chris, thank you for getting the truth out there. I’m sure your Canada conference was eye opening. I imagine there are several phases ex scilons and current scilons have to go through before they can really take in the full truth of what they were and are put through because of LRH and DM using them to make loads of cash. I refrain from calling them suckers or gullible, because I truly believe they are good caring folk with good intentions. I just wish them all well and pray that they make it out alive.
    Happy 4th of July!

  7. This is a short, to the point and great video Chris. Hubbard was a ‘creative’ writer and most of all, a plagiarist when it came to anything resembling help for humankind. I am in the middle of reading Bare Faced Messiah, and can see now how Ron Hubbard wanted to make money by creating a religion, technology or whatever people want to see it as. I wish I had read this book five years ago, when I started to look at the internet, because it would have made things much easier for me to reconcile, and quicker too. Keep making your videos Chris, which are always informative to people whether they’ve been in Scientology or not, and helpful to those of us who have left it.

  8. Interesting summary, you are right in saying it is a complex situation. But Dianetics coming straight out of psychoanalysis is a trifle oversimplified. It was the improvements on the analysis such as refraining from evaluation and the standardized procedure which one could call a modernization of analysis and that could warrant a new name. Similar things have been done by many scientists or practitioners. To say that Bucky Fuller invented the two terminal universe is a bit exaggerated as well. Ask any electrician….

    Just to put in my two bits..

    1. Check out Hubbard’s 1950 – 1952 demonstration auditing sessions – they are full of evaluations of the preclear as well as smarmy opinions and comments about what the preclear is saying. As to Bucky Fuller, Hubbard himself said that is where he got the idea of a two-terminal universe from, so if there is any exaggeration in that statement it is from Hubbard, not me. I don’t think you have come to the right place to argue the validity of L. Ron Hubbard’s pseudoscience and nonsense. It’s actually not complex at all, as I think I make pretty clear in my closing statements in this video.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.