Critical Q&A #28

Great vid, thank you. Thank you specifically for the explanation regarding the use of Victim Tech™. I’ve seen it happen and its kinda sad. It seems coupled to another decompression phase some go through where Exes take on *all* the blame and sorta beat themselves up about their experience.

L Ron Hubbard’s Victim Tech™ is a supremely cynical method of control because Scientologists will, when necessary, become a victim, or at least mock one up. The tactic was explained to me . . .

The Scientology Dictionary defines “Victim” as “1. a destroyed or threatened with destruction receipt point. 2. a victim is an unwilling and unknowing effect of life, matter, energy, space and time.”

Also, in Scientology, the word “victim” is sometimes associated with the “dramatizing of a service facsimile,” where someone becomes a “victim” to get sympathy and to gain other perceived advantages.

“Victims” in Scientology are frowned upon if they are being victims of Scientology.

BUT THERE’S A TWIST, a SWITCH, a FAST ONE, A TURN AROUND, a GIMMICK, A PLOY, A TRICK – after all this IS Scientology.

Per its founders confidential instructions one is to USE ENEMY TACTICS, and these include “ABERRATIVE” TACTICS.

Scientologists, when interacting with “Wogs” (humanoids who, of course, are aberrated) and “SPs” and “DBs,” if it is regarded as forwarding Scientology, will USE ENEMY TACTICS.

One of the traits of lower (non Scientology) beings is that they “become victims,” and use “being a victim” to their advantage.

So, following L. Ron Hubbard’s instructions in his “Scientology Philosophy,” when dealing with the ENEMY (including the “Wogs” who are “PTS” – or they’d have become Scientologists – to the “SPs”), one plays at being a VICTIM.

Scientologists are continually being victimized by the SPs, ANTI-SCIENTOLOGISTS, BIGOTS, the HATERS, the BASHERS, the NATTERERS, the ANTI-RELIGIOUS HATERS AND BIGOTS who “attack their “Scientology religion.”

The details of this sort of thing can be found in Scientology’s (mostly, but not entirely, non-confidential) PR Tech (and beware, the PR Tech is deceptively multi-layered, as is Scientology over-all), its (mostly confidential) Propaganda Tech (works along with PR Tech), and its (almost entirely confidential) covert “Intelligence Tech.”

Bits of these usually confidential instructions by Scientology’s founder can be found in Scientology’s founder’s writings and lectures, and these filter (or flow) down to the Scientologists, and shape their thinking.

Scientologists love to play at being the victim if it’s seen as being an advantageous ploy or trick or gimmick or angle (all terms used by the spiritual leader of the Scientologists, L. Ron Hubbard).

Scientology is a secretive subject, and one of the traits of a Scientologist is to be influenced by Scientology in ways he/she does not fully understand. So, a Scientologist will sometimes “play the victim card” against a “wog” or “basher” or “SP” without being fully aware of the LRH source material upon which these actions are based.

One of the reasons why it’s so awkward to talk about Scientology with a Scientologist is that Scientologists don’t fully know what Scientology is. The Scientologist doesn’t know the full contents of the secretive subject to which he/she has given his/her allegiance, and has opened wide his/her mind for “Hubbard Guidance . . .

. . . I know you do not have the time to explain everything about everything which comes up in the questions you address. Hope you don’t mind me leaving a parallel consideration