So far, most of my videos have been about Scientology. As a former member of that organization, I have plenty of reasons to speak out against it and I will continue to do so. But my blog and website are called Critical Thinker at Large for a reason. I’m not the Ex-Scientologist at Large. So here we go with something new.
I’m taking up a challenge here. I’ve been accused of not being a critical thinker because I look on global conspiracy theories with doubts and skepticism. Now a majority of people don’t actually buy into the notion of conspiracies. If you are one of these people, I think you’re going to find this video very helpful in understanding why people do subscribe to these beliefs. It may also help when you are confronted by someone who insists on arguing with you about them.
For those of you who do believe in global conspiracies, I’m not here to tell you that your conspiracy theory is bollocks because I don’t know if it’s true or not. Just because I don’t believe your premise right away does not mean that I’m saying it’s not true. It’s not a black and white issue to me.
However, if you are going to be intellectually honest, then you need to admit that you don’t know either. That is what skepticism and critical thinking are all about.
For anyone to assert with total certainty that they know something is fact just because they read it on the internet is a parody of critical thinking.
Information Abuse
We are in the information age, but all that means is that information, raw data, is easier to access and there is a higher volume of that data than ever before. But just because data is faster to access and there’s more of it doesn’t mean we as human beings have gotten any better at understanding it any easier or processing it any faster.
We are all guilty of information abuse. By this I mean we receive data that may be alarming or interesting and we don’t evaluate that information before we accept it as true and pass it on. It’s the accepting it as true part that is especially important. When we don’t verify that information, don’t take the time to find out if we have all the story, if it’s even a current story, or if that event even happened…when we pass it on to others we are forwarding a lie.
I have good reasons to have a skeptical attitude. I think that if everyone shared my skepticism, we’d live in a much calmer and more civil world. There’s plenty to be upset about, plenty of bad news for us to worry about every day. But we don’t need to make stuff up to make it even worse.
Global Conspiracies
Conspiracies occur every single day, including ones that involve government operatives, bankers, financiers and people in other positions of power. We have seen these exposed in the media and the justice system. Real people were caught, admitted that they did conspire and they were sentenced to jail for their crimes. This is an irrefutable fact.
So if conspiracies do happen, then why do I think conspiracy theories suck?
By conspiracy theory, I mean these ideas of global or grand conspiracies. They involve agents and institutions stretching across the globe and influence almost everyone through government, media, religious and business manipulation. Most of these theories claim that these globe-spanning conspiracies have been going on right under our noses for decades or even centuries and would involve tens, hundreds or even thousands of people knowingly conspiring against the rest of the world population.
I’m sorry to say that I used to fall for these myself. I actually had an elaborate chart which showed the relationship of the bankers, the psychiatrists, educational institutions, the various world governments and the major media corporations. I could explain how all of them were working in collusion to create a New World Order whose sole purpose was to enslave all of mankind, all under the direction of the Bilderburg Group led by immensely wealthy families such as the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds.
We used to use this conspiracy information to recruit people to work in the upper levels of Scientology. Scientologists fall for this stuff almost uniformly because Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard was a conspiracy nut. He had a very elaborate conspiracy theory worked out as to how almost every government and mental health organization in the world was against Scientology. It was easy to convince Scientologists to hand over their money when they thought we were the only group effectively fighting back against the New World Order.
The Conspiracy Cult
For some people, conspiracies have become the fallback explanation for everything that is wrong in the world. Every time a news story breaks of some disaster or unfortunate turn of events, some people immediately assume that it must be some conspiracy at work – some secret organization – trying to destroy the world and their livelihood along with it.
It’s not just a lazy explanation or opinion. It actually has the characteristics of a cult belief system and I don’t like cults. If you challenge someone on his conspiracy theory, the conversation almost instantly degenerates into name calling and righteous indignation. There’s a black-and-white thinking going on, where if you aren’t part of the solution then you are part of the problem. I don’t think that viewpoint is healthy for anyone.
If the best argument you can make for your claim is to send a link to a conspiracy article or to call someone names when they challenge you, then you are not a critical thinker. Critical thinking involves a little bit more mental discipline than that.
Critical Thinking to the Rescue
I want to help everyone to explain their positions more clearly, more logically and more easily. If you have reason to believe that there is some conspiracy at work, then the information I give you here will be of use in proving it. So stick with me and see if this doesn’t help you out.
1. Verify your facts with independent confirmation
The key word here is independent. Going to four different blogs that copy and paste the same conspiracy theory is not independent confirmation of your facts. Can you verify the facts that you are presenting through something other than a website? Can you find articles, books or media who are neutral or even antipathetic to your conspiracy theory who will still confirm the facts you are presenting?
2. Be willing to be challenged
In science and in critical thinking, it is routine and expected that any theory will be challenged over and over again. Einstein’s theory of relatively was not accepted just because Einstein said it was true or because he got really upset with people if they found flaws in his reasoning. The only way that a theory becomes more than a theory is through independent confirmation and by testing it for alternaive explanations.
Do you think that your ideas of conspiracy are beyond reproach and that anyone who challenges you is not being a critical thinker? Then I would say that you have a misunderstanding of how critical thinking actually works.
Challenging a theory is not a personal attack. If the theory is correct, it will stand up to challenge and in fact could be further clarified and expanded by such challenges. On the other hand, if there are errors in logic or the theory is wrong, challenges to it will quickly point these out. Either way, a critical thinker will want to get to the truth.
3. Think up other explanations or reasons before sticking with the one you like. Make sure your theory explains all the facts and not just some of them.
In science, no theory is tested just once. Theories are routinely tested over and over and over again. One reason why is because of a tendency we all have as human beings to only look at facts and evidence which support our pre-conceived ideas for things, and reject or forget anything which doesn’t.
This is called confirmation bias and we all do it. If you think you’re somehow immune to this, you aren’t.
Here’s an example: On October 25, 2014, a large convoy of dozens of trucks was depicted on video, traveling on Interstate 64 under what appeared to be State Trooper escort. The video was posted on Facebook and immediately there were many comments asserting nefarious purposes for the convoy. One said the trucks were full of ammunition for secret underground military bases so they (yes, they!) could finally institute martial law. Another claimed the trucks were taking food to concentration camps on the east coast. Yet another commenter said the trucks were full of foreign military troops who were secretly being transported across the country so they could initiate a nationwide takeover of the country.
Each of these conspiracy minded people were using confirmation bias to explain what they were seeing. There were clues to the real purpose of this convoy in the news stories about it, but those clues were ignored and instead they jumped to these off-the-wall conclusions.
This police-escorted convoy was actually a charity event where police escort a convoy of trucks through cities and towns in 38 states and Canada. The event helps raise funds and awareness for Special Olympics athletes and this last year about 110 vehicles participated in the ride. The year before, this same event raised $20,000.
I don’t think that the press release on this or the Snopes article confirming this information changed the minds of any of the conspiracy theorists who were so sure that these trucks were bearers of doom. But if you do take the time to get all the facts, you’ll often find that your first guess was not always the best one.
4. Do not rely too heavily on “authorities”. Verify the legitimacy of your sources and ask yourself “Who benefits from me accepting this information as true?”
We all have authorities in our lives. We put our faith in them to explain things we don’t understand or to direct us to information that we should trust. These are people like our parents or teachers or leaders in whatever subjects we are interested in. No one can get through life just relying solely on their own wits or observations. We are all in this together and it’s natural to rely on people who know more than we do.
However, always always always be willing to question any authority figure. There simply isn’t anyone who is infallible or who knows everything.
Every single scientist, philosopher, doctor, religious leader, politician and parent has been wrong about something. And maybe the thing that you are so sure they are telling you the truth about is one of those things they are getting wrong. Listen to them but be cautious about taking only their word for it.
As to websites and blogs, you can’t always be sure that what you’re looking at is reliable. Just because something looks or sounds legitimate does not mean it is. There are some sites that will show you nothing but the facts that support whatever theory or idea the site owner wants to push, such as Alex Jones’ or David Icke’s sites. These are the epitomte of confirmation bias. A story or article may appear to be complete until you look elsewhere and find other facts that have been conveniently omitted or ignored because they don’t support whatever agenda that site owner is trying to push. Unfortunately, this also extends to the mainstream media and is not just something that happens on conspiracy websites.
You owe it to yourself to get all the facts from a number of legitimate sources.
5. When trying to decide on which idea may be the correct one, use Occam’s Razor.
Occam’s Razor is a very old principle that dates back as far as Aristotle and states “other things being equal, simpler explanations are generally better than more complex ones.”
Another way of stating this concept would be “When considering the facts, the explanation that requires the fewest assumptions or inferrences is usually the better explanation.”
One of the biggest problems I have with global conspiracy theories is that in order to believe them, you have to draw inferences or make assumptions which are not logical and which rely on pure coincidence.
Making connections with incomplete information and filling in the blanks is a part of logic, but if you have to stretch too far or infer too much, you’re not proving anything, you’re just playing a guessing game. That’s not good logic and it’s not good critical thinking.
There is also a tendency amongst conspiracy theorists to invent false causality, drawing caue-and-effect relationships between two or more things that in reality have no relationship at all. To their way of thinking, accidents never happen, there is no such thing as coincidence and every event must have a man-made cause.
Conclusion
The world is a vastly large and complicated place. Thousands of different corporations, religious organizations, government agencies and mass media all vie for our attention, our money and, to one degree or another, to control us. There’s no question that these groups can and do exert influence.
But global conspiracy theories actually trivialize the complexity of geo-political situations and offer up a simplistic world view that make it seem like everyone and everything is controlled by a few puppet masters. These ideas are almost fairy-tale like in their simplicity and in their believability.
It takes a lot of time and effort to grasp all of the causes and consequences of even one military conflict or socio-economic crisis. To think that all of the world’s problems all boil down to one simple explanation is simply to deny reality. You can do it but don’t expect to be taken seriously.
I hope this data is useful to you, not just to investigate conspiracy theories but for any claims that sound dubious or too good to be true. I’d be very interested to hear what you have to say about anything I’ve said here.
Thank you for watching.
Chris – great video. Keep them coming! Have you ever thought about doing a critical thinking episode for kids? The earlier these techniques are learned, the better.
In espionage there are no chance happenings.
This is a CIA Maxim, as this one is:
“The best place to hide something is right in front of you”
I’d recommend strongly that you read
The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters Hardcover – April 1, 2000
by Frances Stonor Saunders
great video! i think you need somehow to send this to tom cruise and have him watch this 24/7 on a continuous loop for about a year!
I agree completely. In this day of the twitter/email/24 hr a day news outlets/whistleblowers/and book deals…how hard would it be to keep a secret that big. I think there would be dozens of people looking to cash in on an automatic best seller if they blew the whistle on a conspiracy. That being said, I do think there’s a tendency to be loyal to the source of our paycheck so will not squeal on their employers out of fear. I also think there are many people who would rather ignore certain facts in their company/job because it’s too much trouble or they are just too busy to see as they whiz through their day. And then there are companies like the ones with oil spills who try to cover it up and that can get ugly which tend to support conspiracy theories. But I agree with you Chris. We must be critical thinkers or the world can look very dark and evil and that’s not healthy at all. I have actually checked news stories at times between two opposing news channels like the liberal channels and the more conservative ones and found certain alarming reports to be much ado about nothing. Buried in the story is a fact like, “this was never proven” or some such, but meanwhile the story got traction and others forwarded it because the story supported their position on politics. They would rather support their position than look thoroughly to see if the story is true or not. I saw a youtube video of a beautiful girl with the photoshop process in reverse and it turns out the blonde was originally a piece of pizza! The graphic artist took a piece of pizza and using photoshop tools turned a piece of pepperoni pizza into a gorgeous blonde in a red bikini. With that in mind we must be critical thinkers. If we can’t believe what we see with out own eyes, i.e. the blonde, our brains better stay sharp with critical thinking skills. LOL
I too saw that manipulation. Really impressive work on the part of the photoshopper.
Scientology is a gigantic conspiracy. If that’s possible to do, you don’t think it’s possible to pull that off globally?
I think Scientology is a different scenario because their “employees” are under a dictatorship where they “believe” they are doing what’s best for the rest of us. They are harassed if they squeal and hounded if they do. and yet…there are books out there whistle blowing on them too so their conspiracy has the spotlight on it. Thus…no more conspiracy. I know they lie and cover up and obfuscate and hire lawyers to blow smoke up our skirts but at least it’s well known now. 🙂
I think calling scientology a “gigantic” conspiracy is pushing it. It has never been big enough to be considered gigantic.
When you’re born into it, like myself, totally believe in it and take it for granted that LRH is telling you the truth, it is indeed a gigantic conspiracy when you pull out of it and get the correct info. The fact that ppl think this can’t possibly be happening on a global scale seems ridiculous to me. The evidence is there for ppl who do use critical thinking skills in actual practice.
Nice video, Chris, with lots of good information. I have quite a few conspiracy believers in my life, and much as I love them, it drives me nuts sometimes! Keep up the excellent work – your videos are long enough to give the important info, but not too long to put people off watching them. 🙂
Thank you for that Chris. Excellent work. I’m a better person having read that 🙂
I am not a scientologist, but I am a daily reader of Tony Ortega’s blog The Underground Bunker and have seen quite a few of your videos. I thought I would comment on this one because of one of your statements that “there are no coincidences”. That is a statement I do believe in. I can only say that what has seemed a coincidence to me or my wife has, in the long run, proved to be something that needed to take place in order for other things to happen. Hard to explain, and even harder to give examples of, but there you have it.
But there are other very important facts that you pointed out in your video that I have practiced in that I would like to explain.
I read somewhere that what we read on the internet is a reflection of what we believe in. Being a NYC liberal Jew transplanted to South Carolina and living here for over 40 years, I find myself a square peg in a very well defined round hole of conservatism. I decided to test the statement about what I actually read on the internet. My fist impression of the statement was BS since I try and get a “well balanced” idea of facts by going to all sorts of news articles and blogs, so I kept a log of where I went for about two weeks and….well…hmmm…the statement was spot on…I am a bleeding heart liberal.
My a taste of my reading habits are as follows, in no particular order: Right Wing Watch, Politicus USA, NY Times, Media Matters, Solon, NY Daily News, The Underground Bunker, both Mike and Marty’s blogs, the Village Voice and I could go on. On the right side I read some of Glenn Becks drivel, Info Wars (when I can stomach his screaming and out right craziness) World Net Daily (now that’s really a hoot to read, when I don’t get outraged by it’s stupidity) Bryan Fisher, Tony Perkins and a couple of other “wingnuts”. As you can see by my comments, I am really neutral in my opinions of both sides of the story (I can be so full of BS sometimes it scares me). But what I do do, that has been stated in your video is “follow the facts”.
It drives me nuts to read the Underground Bunker because of all the followup I have to do. Take for example today’s article about “How scientology responds to adversity. I had to follow up on the Time magazine article by Richard Behar and read it, then in the comments section, I had to follow up on your comment and found this blog. Being the news hound I am, I set aside about two to three hours here and there to read articles and research those that I need to flesh out.
What I am getting at here, and something that you mentioned, is that I have to be very careful about what I read because of my liberal philosophy, it tends to color how I view articles, so I try (operative word there is “try”) to get the full story from as many news or blog sources as I can and that can be daunting. What I can say is that I am pretty good at sniffing out facts and following leads. I use Google, Bing and some other engines, and go deeper than just the first page.
I like this particular video and will keep it handy when I am blundering my way through the internet. Thanks.
I like that you’ve gone in a different direction this time, Chris. I have enjoyed your scientology videos so much, but you have so much more to give in terms of critical thinking and encouraging the deployment of our brain cells. Top work!
Hi Chris,
You said, “the only way a theory becomes more than theory…”
I would ask that you please be careful about how you use the word theory. Einstein’s theories of Relativity are still theories. They haven’t become something else because of wide scale acceptance. This is tricky because of the gulf in the scientific and popular meanings of the word. So, in the scientific sense, conspiracy theories are theories at all. They don’t usually rise to the level of hypothesis. They are mostly unsupported assertions.
Correction: “…conspiracy theories are NOT theories…”
Yes, I do understand the distinction. There are laws in science which theories eventually graduate up to. Those are what I was referring to when I was talking about something becoming more than a theory.
Not all conspiracy thinkers are belligerent and closed minded as you say, so in that sense you are knocking down a straw man. Yes, some of them are closed minded as you describe but this is not a trait unique to conspiracy thinkers. Many people with a strong political bias fit the personality type you are describing. Just try pointing out to a strong Republican or Democrat that their side is not always the side of the angels and the other side is not always the epitome of evil. There is an us versus them mentality among political movements of any stripe.
Confirmation bias as you say extends to the mainstream media. Conspiracy sites are not the only ones that show a bias to a certain viewpoint, and this does not necessarily negate what they say. Most political websites also only show one side of the story. I don’t think sites like the Daily Kos are going to have anything good to say about Rand Paul. Fox News is not going to say good things about Obama. I have not checked either site recently, but correct me if I am wrong on this. Yet fans of both Daily Kos and Fox News would call me biased because of my conspiracy viewpoints.
I would certainly not say that conspiracy viewpoints are negated because they mostly appear on the internet rather than also in other media. Most anti-Scientology material is online. Critical books and articles in mainstream media mostly only appeared recently and I would say this was only made possible by the free flow of info on the internet.
When I was first introduced to conspiracy ideas I sometimes had a little excess zeal about it, and defensiveness. This is probably true of a lot of people who have a sudden change in their world view, and are espousing an unpopular viewpoint. I’ve calmed down since then, but it has been a process. It’s not easy to go from being part of the mainstream to being an outlier. Maybe in a way it’s like leaving a cult. Your old friends may not disconnect but they don’t want to hear what you have to say.
The challenge is to not turn your new thinking into something cult-like. Believe me there is a lot of criticism of both Alex Jones and David Icke in conspiracy circles. Not everyone in the movement believes everything they say, although there are some that do, just as there are some that believe everything Fox News has to say. Both Icke and Jones can be good sources of information but as you say no one person or group has all the answers.
Not everything is a conspiracy, as you point out with the truck convoy incident. But this does not negate the fact that conspiracies exist and that you can’t always believe the official story. Many of our wars have been started on false stories that are just as much of a fairy tale as the more outlandish conspiracy theories are considered to be.
I hate to see conspiracy thinkers like myself being reduced to a stereotype. We are a varied group with a lot of different personality types. We can’t be lumped together. But I’ve learned to live with the way we are perceived and I try not to let it affect the way I present my ideas.
Wow, that is an awesome post Chris, I totally agree with you! You have made me see the light. I think we should all be really skeptical and take these conspiracy theories like government involvement in the killing of JFK, MLK, 9/11, Vietnam being really about heroin trafficking, the Fast and Furious Mexican thing with claims the U.S. gov. was arming gangs etc., with a grain of salt put out by wack jobs because they have nothing better to do with their time whilst posing as caring and responsible people who sincerely want to help people.
But I do have a friend here who is a genius critical thinker like you and also spent years in the Sea Org in ANZO (hi OSA ANZO) who got out years ago but wants to keep his identity concealed because of fears of getting seriously Fair Gamed by OSA as he has some very incriminating evidence against Scientology that will bring it down here (even though it is in it’s death throes now) and at the right time soon he is going to bring it out. We will call him ‘Bob’ for security reasons.
Here is what Bob emailed me through hushmail after reading your post and asked me to forward it on the you Chris – ”Firstly, I love your vids Chris and well done for having the courage to expose the conspiracy of Scientology! You are a genius critical thinker and I wish there were more of us around as it is lonely at the top!
The major questions I have for you and want to pick your brains with in order to validate what appears to be our shared unique critical thinking abilities are –
Have you done a lot of research on ”global conspiracy” (no doubt you have but I have to ask being a critical thinker )?
What would be your ratio of conspiracy research in Scientology as compared to conspiracy research in global matters?
Do you believe there is conspiracy to defraud in Scientology?
Would current Scientologists consider you a conspiracy theorist and possibly a deluded psycho by what you put out in regards to Scientology and it’s leader (i know the one’s I knew in the past that I have bumped into since I have left have said that of me but they called me by the label of SP instead of the label conspiracy theorist)?
Is it possible that others have thoroughly researched global conspiracies in like manner that you have of Scientology and consider and know there is a genuine conspiracy(s) happening but you do not have the information they have?
Could those people have enough surety of their information to put it on social media like you do in regards to Scientology?
Is it possible that a few at the top in the media and banking sectors could be controlling the opinion of the masses and finances like David Miscavige does in Scientology and that Scientology could be considered a microcosm of the macrocosm?
Could the fact (or conspiracy) that only a few in Scientology control the show with compartmalized networks such as Ad and Exec councils, HCO, OSA, CMO,WDC, CLO’s, FLB, FB etc. and in like manner could that possibly be the case in regards to the world with similar groups such as the CIA, M15,the FDA, the Council on Foreign Relations, G8, G20, Trilateral Commision, Bilderberg, World Bank, IMF, UN etc.?
Could another or others think of people as lazy and irresponsible who are dismissive of global conspiracy theory?
Do you think another or others could think of you as propagating a Cult of Skeptism whilst you are accusing others of promoting a Cult of Conspiracy?
Do you believe whistleblowers such as Ed Snowden (who you have very well validated in an earlier post) have said, that there is a conspiracy in regards to your communications being monitored by the NSA plus the U.S. was busted for spying on the German gov. and other countries such as Australia have come out and said their communications are being monitored too and also the Aussie gov. has admitted spying on the Indonesian gov?
When these spying things happen in regard to other countries (if in fact these German and Indo allegations are true and are not a conspiracy) does this not fit the definition of a global conspiracy when it gets out of one’s own borders and considering one would think more countries are involved?
Could it be possible that with global conspiracies in the past that have been exposed that others could be happening now and could be effecting you and your loved ones?
Has there ever been other governments, rulers, royalties etc. ever try and conquer and rule the world as empires in the history of man or could stories that say that just be fallacies or conspiracies?
Why would it be different now if they were not fallacies in the past?
Could it be very irresponsible to be dismissive of these things potentially happening if they are not already and skeptics who don’t look could be potentially endangering the life of many?
Now I am on your side Chris and love your post here and just want to apply what you apply and be a resolute critical thinker and get your take on things to ensure we are 100% on the right page, so I know you will answer these questions with a great deal of aplomb and surety.
We have the shared goal along with Jeff in regards to the injustices (or the injustices that conspiracy theorists are saying, but are not happening!). Thank you”.
Much Love,
Bob
p.s. I will give you the first scoop on some damning evidence in ANZO soon so stay tuned but in the meantime I will wait for your answers.
LOL. Hi Jeff and “Bob”. I think I made my position on the subject pretty clear in the video and it’s not necessary to answer detailed questions back and forth about it. Besides, I don’t need to since all of your questions are “could this” and “could that” and of course the answer to any kind of “could this be possible?” question is “Yes – that could be possible.” That doesn’t mean the hypothetical possibility is a reality or even very likely. There has been a surprising amount of solid work done on the subject of conspiracy theories and the mindset of those who fall for the illogical fallacies and inconsistencies inherent in them. I want to recommend two reads for you on this: (1) Carl Sagan’s seminal work on critical thinking and science called The Demon Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark and (2) the Rational Wiki page on conspiracy theorists (http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theorists) which gives a great list of conspiracies which are actually likely to have occurred and a Conspiracy Theory Checklist to help anyone determine how likely any conspiracy theory is based on its merits and evidence. I cannot recommend either of these sources of information enough. If you and “Bob” truly count yourselves as critical thinkers and expect to be taken seriously, you need to get very familiar with both of these resources and use them.
Gee that’s disappointing that you have decided to ”sit on the fence” and could not answer those questions Chris. Bob is now very arcx, especially as he puts you up there as someone he admires! Even old Ron said always answer questions, did he not? Where’s the old Sea Org comradeship, too?
But I suppose if you answer those questions it would expose you as a fella who only thinks critical on the things you have looked at, and things you have not looked at and have not bothered to do the research on, you just label it conveniently as a ”conspiracy theory” perhaps because you have a ”beef” with someone who does put in the time and effort to research things (rather than sit around watching TV half the day) and exposes genuine conspiracies.
As my good friend Bob said in his email to you, he just wanted to see how you think critically across the boards, even on things you disagree with which would then show how powerful and genuine a critical thinker you really are rather than just a ”fair weather” critical thinker who uses critical thinking to dismiss what he does not agree with and validate what he agrees with!Bob told me he considers that fairly weak.
Those questions are perfectly valid and you would have genuine facts on some of them to, would you not? Not just hypothesis, yeah?
We know labels are popular in Scientology but nearly always gross generalizations to put someone ”in a basket” i.e. out-ethics, PTS, SP. You are fairly new out so the good news for you is such implanted Scientology desires to label things to put them in a box that suits one’s reality just like Hubbard so consistently did, will slowly disappear the longer one is out and the Hubbard spell wears off. As Bob said, it is great what you are doing to help others shake that spell too, and we know it is not easy Chris.
The term conspiracy theory is a thought stopping term designed to make anyone look like ”kooks” who actually do know of genuine conspiracies. A simple intelligence trick that easily fools the masses and less critically minded, and the boys who created this one know this and it is the modus operandi of the shills who propagate it.I am not saying you are a knowing shill, I don’t think anyone is paying you!
It probably originated a million years ago (hypothesis only) when Joe the Caveman was having an affair with Jane the Cavewoman next door and when his partner called him out, he called her the equivalent of a conspiracy kook in order to introvert her and doubt herself so that he did not get caught.
Of course, it has been refined by intelligence agencies and their researchers, politicians etc. for their benefit. Even you could see that (I hope,lol).
To classify anyone as a “black and white” conspiracy theorist who believes EVERY conspiracy theory is fact, is just a plain silly generalization and even Scn. states generalizations like that are anti social. I have never met such a person but you may ”think” you know such a person as I am sure it suits your belief. The only one I ever saw close to your generalized description was Mel Gibson in the movie ”Conspiracy Theory” (and he was proven right,lol)
In terms of Wiki I do not find them a wholly trusted source from extensive use of it and some mistruths they have put out that I have found, but unlike you I am willing to look and you can ask me what I think about it as I am always open to answering questions and have nothing to hide.
Thank you for your offer on reading Sagan’s book (I used to watch his TV shows when I owned a TV set and was a spectator of life for 5 or 6 hours a day and there was a lot of his stuff I did not agree with at the time, from distant memory. So I will pass on that offer, as well I have a backlog of books here I need to read).
The only science I majorly believe in from my critical research is science based on Nature and Natural Law (rather than just theory) by such greats as Viktor Shauberger, NikolaTesla, Dr. Bruce Lipton and Walter Russell. I thoroughly recommend you get ”Nature As Teacher” by Viktor Shauberger and also the 950 page home study course by Walter Russell called “Universal Law, Natural Science And Living Philosophy” and it can be purchased here http://www.dowsers.com cheaply at less than $200. Super value and you will get more out of it than what Scn can give one (based on my opinion anyway having studied both)
I can recommend many videos from trusted sources (at least from my extensive research) in regards to ”conspiracy theories” and also conspiracies proven true but unfortunately with your fixed ideas and non critical thinking in this area, I am 100% sure you won’t watch them, so I won’t bother.
Anyway, although Bob is very upset with you he still loves your videos and says you are a good guy but he is also empathic in the long journey away from Scientology you are on.
Thank you Chris.
Great video Chris. A half a millenium ago when I was in university, Symbolic Logic was one of the courses relevant to my major, and it was also one of the best courses I could have taken. It really helped me to think critically and analyse the information presented as fact by news organisations and politicians. Your video only reinforced why the need to employ such thinking is so very important. Thanks again!